<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modeling blog post comment counts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/</link>
	<description>by Paul Ogilvie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pogil</title>
		<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-26401</link>
		<dc:creator>pogil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pogil.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-26401</guid>
		<description>Kyle, I&#039;m not exactly sure what you&#039;re asking, so let me take a stab at briefly summarizing the model and its random variables. 

In this task X ~ NB(r, p), where X is the random variable (the observed number of comments on a blog post from a given blog) and NB refers to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_binomial_distribution&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;negative binomial distribution&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, I&#039;ve taken a Bayesian view of r and p for the parameters of the negative binomial, choosing to view them as random variables as well. I&#039;ve modeled r using a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_prime_distribution&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beta prime&lt;/a&gt; and p as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_distribution&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beta&lt;/a&gt;. Computing the exact Bayesian distribution for X was overkill for my use case and not terribly computationally efficient, so I chose to use maximum-a-posteriori estimates for r and p when computing the distribution of X for a blog.

I hope this helps clarify how I&#039;ve modeled blog post comment counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle, I&#8217;m not exactly sure what you&#8217;re asking, so let me take a stab at briefly summarizing the model and its random variables. </p>
<p>In this task X ~ NB(r, p), where X is the random variable (the observed number of comments on a blog post from a given blog) and NB refers to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_binomial_distribution" rel="nofollow">negative binomial distribution</a>. Additionally, I&#8217;ve taken a Bayesian view of r and p for the parameters of the negative binomial, choosing to view them as random variables as well. I&#8217;ve modeled r using a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_prime_distribution" rel="nofollow">beta prime</a> and p as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_distribution" rel="nofollow">beta</a>. Computing the exact Bayesian distribution for X was overkill for my use case and not terribly computationally efficient, so I chose to use maximum-a-posteriori estimates for r and p when computing the distribution of X for a blog.</p>
<p>I hope this helps clarify how I&#8217;ve modeled blog post comment counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle ward</title>
		<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-26374</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pogil.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-26374</guid>
		<description>uhhhmm are there any random variate or variable involved here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uhhhmm are there any random variate or variable involved here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Carman</title>
		<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-22207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Carman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pogil.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-22207</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post Paul. Thanks for sharing your technique!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post Paul. Thanks for sharing your technique!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pogil.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi, Paul, thanks for your reply and the updated details. Now I understand it better.

I apologize for two typos, i.e., Y=X/(1+X) (should be Y=X/(1-X)) and X=Y/(1-Y) (should be X=Y/(1+Y)) in my earlier comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Paul, thanks for your reply and the updated details. Now I understand it better.</p>
<p>I apologize for two typos, i.e., Y=X/(1+X) (should be Y=X/(1-X)) and X=Y/(1-Y) (should be X=Y/(1+Y)) in my earlier comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pogil.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a great post. I understand the part the posterior p&#124;{x1,...,xn} was induced. However, what is not equivalently intuitive to me is the part about the posterior r&#124;{x1,...,xn}. Could you talk a bit more about why beta prime distribution was chosen for r?
 
As mentioned, ``if X ~ Beta(a, b), then Y = X/(1+X) ~ Beta&#039;(a, b)&#039;&#039;. In another word, if Y ~ Beta&#039;(a, b), then X = Y/(1-Y) ~ Beta(a, b). If `Y&#039; is substituted by r, which variable will be the substitution of `X&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a great post. I understand the part the posterior p|{x1,&#8230;,xn} was induced. However, what is not equivalently intuitive to me is the part about the posterior r|{x1,&#8230;,xn}. Could you talk a bit more about why beta prime distribution was chosen for r?</p>
<p>As mentioned, &#8220;if X ~ Beta(a, b), then Y = X/(1+X) ~ Beta&#8217;(a, b)&#8221;. In another word, if Y ~ Beta&#8217;(a, b), then X = Y/(1-Y) ~ Beta(a, b). If `Y&#8217; is substituted by r, which variable will be the substitution of `X&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why we model comment counts &#60; Information Retrieval on the Live Web</title>
		<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Why we model comment counts &#60; Information Retrieval on the Live Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pogil.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Retrieval on the Live Web by Paul Ogilvie     &lt; Modeling blog post comment counts What makes a blog post popular? series at mSpoke blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Retrieval on the Live Web by Paul Ogilvie     &lt; Modeling blog post comment counts What makes a blog post popular? series at mSpoke blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why We Model Comment Counts &#171; Paul Ogilvie</title>
		<link>http://livewebir.com/blog/2008/07/modeling-blog-post-comment-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Why We Model Comment Counts &#171; Paul Ogilvie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pogil.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] at 7:34 pm &#183; Filed under Blogs, Statistics &#183;Tagged comment counts   Last week, I wrote a very technical post on how I model the distribution of comment counts for an RSS feed in FeedHub.  I originally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at 7:34 pm &#183; Filed under Blogs, Statistics &#183;Tagged comment counts   Last week, I wrote a very technical post on how I model the distribution of comment counts for an RSS feed in FeedHub.  I originally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

